Saturday, February 15, 2020

How the New, New York State Annual Professional Performance Review Essay

How the New, New York State Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Regulations changed the Employee Selection Process - Essay Example This paper critically analyzes the impacts of the new NYS Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) Regulations on employee selection process. How the new NYS APPR Regulations Have Changed the Employee (Teacher) Selection Process Introduction In the year 2010, New York State approved the adoption of a new teacher evaluation law that requires the performance review of the teachers to be based on evidence of teacher effectiveness, student growth, student achievement as well as a number of other locally selected measures. Generally the primary objective of the new annual professional performance review (APPR) has been to provide a timely feedback on the effectiveness of the teachers as well an opportunity to acknowledge the strengths and the weaknesses of the educators in their capacity as employees. Previously the recruitment and selection process has been found not to focus much on quality since it led to poor selection by not factoring in other aspects of teaching which may not b e inherent during the normal selection process (Odden, 2011). Consequently the new APPR regulation were introduced to help improve the quality of learning in New York State particularly through enhanced decision making during the teacher selection process. ... This implies that the education system needs highly qualified teachers capable of instilling what is required to enable students to be successful for college and/or post-secondary careers. The need for more quality teachers is currently putting many states under intense pressure to conform to the NCLB act which aims at ensuring that only quality teachers are hired, those who can provide quality education to students(Freeport Public Schools, 2012). New York State is one of the states in America that have successfully made bold steps aimed at improving the quality and value of teachers. With its acceptance for the Race to the top incentive program, hiring effective teachers is now paramount. (www2.ed.gov, 2012).This paper critically examines how the New York State’s (NYS) APPR regulations have changed the employee selection process since its introduction. The relationship between the New NYS APPR Regulations on human resource activities For many years, organizations have always used referrals to help them carry out their human resource activities particularly during the employee selection process when hiring or promoting their employees (Hays and Kearney, 2001). Studies have confirmed that the use of performance reviews in employee selection processes is one of not only a reliable option but is also an easy and cost effective approach that ensures satisfaction both to the organization and to the employees. On the other hand, with the current high number of lawsuits those organizations are increasingly facing as a result of their decisions to hire, promote or terminate an employee, there has been an urgent need to develop new regulations

Sunday, February 2, 2020

Lap 5 Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Lap 5 - Assignment Example Jupiter has a diameter of 142,800km while the sun’s diameter is 1,391,400km. Therefore, the ratio of Jupiter’s diameter to diameter of the sun is 238:2319. Moreover, Jupiter (142,800km) is the largest planet while Mercury (4,878km) is the smallest planet thus the ratio of the largest planet to smallest planet in terms of diameter is 23800:813. The planets seem to fall into groups based on size; smaller planets seem to be in a particular group while bigger planets seem to be in a different group such as Mercury, Mars, Venus and Earth are in one group while Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune seem to be in another group. The surface composition of smaller planets in one group is rocky. Conversely, the surface composition of larger planets is gaseous and frozen gas. The two main differences are the surface composition and the size. The bigger planets also consist of rings, bringing out another clear-cut difference. Terrestrial group consists of Mercury, Mars, Venus and Earth while the members of Jovian group are Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. The difference between the prediction of Bode’s rule and the actual distances is negligible with a range of 0.01-0.02. The planets include Saturn and Neptune. One of the regularities in the planetary orbits discovered by Kepler is moving of planets around the sun in the same direction and the planets having nearly similar orbital planes (Topper